Yazoo Veterans Day

Single Judge Application; This Court has held that “[l]ay testimony is competent . . . to establish the presence of observable symptomatology and ‘may provide sufficient support for a claim of service connection.’” Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 303, 307 (2007) (quoting Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 465, 469 (1994)). As this Court has often noted, “symptoms, not treatment, are the essence of any evidence of continuity of symptomatology.” Savage v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 488, 496 (1997); see also Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 15, 19 (1991) (noting that the “regulation requires continuity of symptomatology, not continuity of treatment”);

GLOBAL VETERANS NEWS

USA VETERAN NEWS

VETERANS SPONSORS

VIP VIDEOS OF VETERANS IN THE NEWS

EU VETERANS NEWS

AFRICAN VETERANS NEWS

ASIA VETERANS

CANADIAN VETERANS

AUSTRALIAN VETERANS

VETERAN SUPPORTS

GLOBAL VETERAN SUPPORTS

VETERANS NONPROFITS

SPONSORSHIP

VETERAN BOOKS

VETERAN BLOGS